The best prompts for CEOs make the model argue with you: premortem, defending the opposite position and an assumption map. This library has 21 AI prompts for CEOs to copy into ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or Gemini, built for decisions that cannot be undone.
Add Founderz as a preferred source
What you’ll take from this
This library of AI prompts for CEOs gives you instructions ready to copy and the method to adapt them to each executive decision.
- 21 AI prompts for CEOs ready to copy: techniques that make the model push back, six executive decisions and tool-specific requests.
- Why the biggest risk of using ChatGPT as chief executive is that the model agrees with you, and the four prompt engineering techniques that fix it: the premortem, defending the opposite position, the assumption map and the double consultation.
- Which tool to open for which material: ChatGPT, Claude for long documents, Copilot in Word, Outlook and Teams, Gemini in Google Workspace.
- A five-field method to write your own strategic prompts, with a before and after.
- What should never leave a CEO’s computer.
If you prefer to learn it guided, an AI for CEOs course at Founderz saves you the rough road of trial and error. To build a custom prompt in a minute, use the free generator.
Free tool
Pick your case, adjust the options and get a complete prompt ready to paste into ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude or Gemini.
Open the generatorChatGPT prompts for CEOs
ChatGPT does well in open debate, premortems, generating options and quick cross-checks. The text in brackets is an example: replace it with your case and keep the rest. The first 10 ChatGPT prompts in this section are the ones that work best for deciding as a CEO. Library reviewed in November 2026. Before you paste anything, read the section on what a CEO should not paste into a chat.
Four prompt engineering techniques that make the model push back
1. The premortem: treat the decision as if it failed
Act as an external consultant. It is [date, 18 months ahead]. The decision of [decision] has failed and we have lost [impact or consequence]. Write the minutes from the meeting where we explain it to the board. Be specific with the sequence of facts and do not be soft. End with the three failure chains that look most like what we are not watching today.2. Defending the opposite position
I am going to pose a business decision. Do not give me your recommendation yet. First write the strongest defense of the opposite option, as someone opposed to it would make it, someone who knows the sector. Then tell me what would have to be true for that opponent to be right. The decision is: [decision, with sector, size and constraints].3. The assumption map
This is my plan: [paste]. List the assumptions it rests on, including ones I have not made explicit. Order them by how much the plan breaks if the assumption proves false, not by probability. For the top three, propose how to detect if they are false in under two weeks and with low budget. Return a table: assumption, what happens if false, how to check, timeline.4. The double consultation (second conversation, without your conclusions)
Open a new conversation and paste only the facts, without your preference: I am the CEO of [company, sector, size]. I have to decide [decision] before [date]. The facts are: [figures and constraints]. Give me the recommendation you would give a board, the two alternatives you would reject and why, and what data point would change your answer. Then compare it with the first conversation: where they diverge is the point worth reviewing with a real person.Six CEO decisions and their strategic prompts
Drafting a vision the team will believe
Act as an internal communication strategist. Help me draft a new vision for [company, sector] that is concrete, memorable and credible to a team of [X] people who have already seen other attempts. Give me three versions with different tone and flag what each one promises that you will have to deliver later.Allocating capital between competing areas
Act as an investment committee. I have [amount] to distribute among [option A], [option B] and [option C]. Context: [sector, size, cash position]. For each option give me the expected return, the timeline to first observable result and what I lose by not choosing the other two. End with the question I should answer before distributing.Entering or exiting a market
Act as an expansion analyst. I am considering opening operations in [market] within [timeline]. Give me the three conditions that would have to hold for it to work and three early signals that it will not work, with the timeline I should see them in. Flag what is verifiable data and what is your inference.Hiring for the executive committee
I am adding a [role] to my executive team. The company is [description] and the challenge over the next 18 months is [challenge]. Create an interview plan with six questions that distinguish someone who has already solved this from someone who can only talk about it. For each one, tell me which answer would be a red flag.Reviewing prices
Act as a pricing lead. I sell [product] to [type of customer] at [current price] and I am considering [change]. Before giving an opinion, tell me which segments would leave first, what argument the competition would use and how to communicate it, with what line of persuasion, so marketing and sales can defend it without resorting to discounts.Closing a project that is not working
We have been on [project] for [time] and it has not reached [goal]. Help me separate the sunk cost, which is unrecoverable, from what I can still decide. Give me the objective criterion I should have set at the start and tell me whether it is met today.Keeping perspective when the decision gets personal
A veteran CEO as an advisor
Act as a CEO with twenty years of experience in [sector] who has been through [situation: a cash crunch, a layoff, a merger]. I am going to tell you what worries me: [description]. Do not reassure me. Tell me what I am failing to see, what he or she would do in the next two weeks and create a three-step plan to regain perspective before deciding.Claude prompts for CEOs
Claude stands out with long documents and drafts that need careful wording. You can paste the full text of a report, a contract or a board pack and ask for work that draws on all of it.
Long documents and careful drafting
Review the board pack before sending it
I am pasting the pack for the next board meeting: [paste management report, figures and proposals]. Act as a demanding board secretary. Find inconsistencies between figures in different sections, claims with no data behind them and the three most uncomfortable questions a director would ask. Cite the source section for each point and do not fill in data that is not in the text.Due diligence summary to decide
I am sending you the documentation for [deal: acquisition, partnership, framework contract]: [paste]. Act as an executive advisor. Return a table of risks by area (financial, legal, operational, people), what evidence is in the text and what is still to request. Close with the three conditions you would set to go ahead. Flag everything that is your inference.Investor letter with careful tone
Draft an investor letter for [quarter] with these facts: [results, variances, decisions taken]. Calm and direct tone, no triumphalism and without hiding the variance in [metric]. Structure: where we stand, what went better and worse than planned, what we decided and what we expect next quarter. Maximum 450 words. Mark in brackets what I need to confirm with finance.Copilot prompts for CEOs
Copilot works inside Word, Excel, Outlook and Teams with the files, emails and meetings you already have access to, so write the prompt by referring to what you have open instead of pasting the text. What it can do exactly depends on your license and your organization’s settings.
For the executive day to day
Word: decision memo
With this document open and the files [names of the two reports] as the source, write a one-page decision memo for the committee: context, options, recommendation, risks and what data point would change the recommendation. Direct tone. Mark with [verify] every figure that does not come from the files.Teams: decisions and owners from the committee meeting
Summarize the meeting [meeting name, date] in three blocks: decisions made, actions with owner and date, and points where there was unresolved disagreement. Say who raised each objection. Do not add anything that was not said in the meeting.Outlook: long thread and reply
Summarize my thread with [name] about [subject] in five lines: what was asked, what was answered and what is still open. Then draft a reply from me under 120 words that fixes [decision or deadline] without closing the door on [alternative].Excel: reading this month’s metrics
Analyze the [month] metrics table in this sheet. Tell me which three changes versus the previous month deserve my attention, what could explain them and what you would check before acting. Show the formula or range you rely on for each figure.Gemini prompts for CEOs
Gemini fits if your company works in Google Workspace: it can draw on Docs, Gmail and Drive. Name the file or thread you mean and make clear what it should produce. Which features you get depends on your Workspace plan.
For leadership in Google Workspace
Docs: briefing for the week
Using the documents in the folder [Drive folder name] and this week's emails from [team or project], prepare a one-page briefing: five things that changed, three new risks and the decisions I owe before [date]. Say which document each point comes from.Gmail: prepare a difficult conversation
Read my thread with [name] about [subject]. Prepare my script for a 20-minute conversation: what I want to achieve, the three arguments I will use, the objections they will probably raise and a closing line that makes the next step clear. Respectful and firm tone.Sheets: scenarios for [plan or budget]
Using the sheet [sheet name], propose three scenarios (cautious, base and optimistic) for [metric: revenue, cash, margin] over [12 months]. For each, list the assumptions that change and what early signal would show we are in that scenario. Present the summary in a table.An inspiring vision does not come from a template: the vision must motivate people who have already heard three earlier versions, and to inspire it takes a phrase that promises something verifiable. Ask for drafts to have something to discuss, not to publish. The consultant, strategist or investment committee you ask the model to be only helps if you give it context, and a good CEO prompt does not replace your judgment.
These twenty-one prompts are enough for the year. Outside the list there is a lot of work a chief executive should not be doing: writing LinkedIn posts, defining the target audience of a digital marketing campaign, marketing and sales messages, email marketing or maximizing the conversion of a funnel. ChatGPT reviews messages for persuasion, spots problems in a team and helps identify improvements. AI performs well at all of it, and even better delegated to whoever runs the area. For examples by business area, see the AI prompts for executives guide.
Why a CEO needs different prompts
An executive prepares decisions that cannot be undone, with incomplete information and their name on the line. A department head asks ChatGPT to organize a report; the result is reviewed Friday and corrected. You prepare something that ends up in front of a board, in a letter to investors or in a conversation with someone you are about to fire.
That creates three requirements that a general-use instruction does not cover. The answer must come with assumptions visible, because you answer for them. It must include the opposing case, because no one else in the room will raise it. And it must separate data from inference, because half of executive decisions are made on incomplete figures.
The writing method, the components of a good prompt and examples by area are in the executives guide. This page assumes you already know how to ask.
The core problem: the model will agree with you
Language models are tuned to produce answers that users rate well, and that pushes them to agree with you. Write “I think we should raise prices, what do you think” and you will get a list of reasons why raising prices makes sense. The tool is not lying. It does what it was tuned for.
For a CEO that aggravates a problem you already had. The higher up someone is, the fewer people push back on them spontaneously. A committee that qualifies little, plus an assistant that qualifies even less, creates a sense of consensus that does not exist. Knowing this is part of the self-awareness of the role and of being a better CEO: the machine will sound reasonable just when you most need someone to stop you.
The fix costs one sentence. Do not ask for an opinion on your position; ask for the opposite position before showing yours. The four techniques in the library are variations on that idea.
How to write your own CEO prompts
Every prompt in this library follows the same five fields. If you master the order, you can build a strategic prompt for any decision that is not here.
| Field | What it decides | Example in the prompt |
|---|---|---|
| Role | The voice and judgment the AI applies | Act as an external consultant, investment committee |
| Context | Sector, size, timeline and constraints | [120-person company, cash for 9 months] |
| Task | One action and its deliverable | write the minutes of the failure at 18 months |
| Format | How to deliver the result | table: assumption, risk, how to check, timeline |
| Limits | What the model must not do | do not be soft, flag what is your inference |
Four tips to make your prompt push back
- Ask for the opposite position before telling yours. Order matters: if you declare your preference first, the model uses it as context and softens.
- Order by fragility, not by probability. An unlikely assumption that sinks the plan deserves more attention than a likely one that only delays it.
- Ask it to separate data from inference and to flag what it cannot know.
- Repeat the request in a new conversation, without your conclusions, and compare the two answers.
A weak prompt and the same prompt strengthened
The weak prompt asks for an opinion on a decision already made. The strengthened one sets role, context, task, format and limits, and asks for disagreement.
| Version | Prompt | What changes |
|---|---|---|
| Weak | I think we should raise prices. What do you think? | The model confirms your idea with reasons in favor. |
| Strengthened | Act as a pricing lead. I sell [product] to [type of customer] at [current price] and I am considering an increase of [a percentage]. Do not give your opinion yet: tell me which segments would leave first, the argument the competition would use and what would have to be true for the increase to be a mistake. Return a table and flag what is your inference. | It forces disagreement, specifics and a split between data and inference. |
Tip
Save the prompts that work in your own document and change a single field at a time, such as the role or the format. That teaches you what each part controls much faster than reading theory.
Which tool to open for an executive decision
None is the best tool in the abstract: they perform differently depending on your source material. For a CEO the useful question is which one to open for this request.
| Tool | Executive request where it does best | Where your data ends up |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Open debate, premortem, generating options and quick cross-checks | Outside your systems, unless on a business plan |
| Claude | Long documents: contracts, due diligence, reports, board minutes | Outside your systems, unless on a business plan |
| Copilot | Requests about your files, emails and meetings in Word, Excel, Outlook and Teams | Inside Microsoft 365 |
| Gemini | Requests connected to your email and documents in Google Workspace | Inside Workspace |
Features and plans change often. Check the current version before deciding.
How the prompt changes per tool
- ChatGPT: accepts attached documents and long conversations. The prompts on this page work as they are; ask for one change at a time.
- Claude: paste the full text and ask it to cite the source section for each point. It is the best option when the material is long.
- Copilot: refer to the open document, email or meeting instead of pasting the text, and ask it to flag what does not come from your files.
- Gemini: name the Drive file or the Gmail thread and make clear what it should produce.
What a CEO should not paste into a chat
A model supports decision-making and responsibility for the outcome stays with you. There is also a layer of information that you handle and the rest of the company does not, and there your standard has to be stricter than the company-wide policy.
Unpublished figures of a corporate transaction, personal data from a disciplinary process or an exit, privileged information about a purchase or sale and anything covered by attorney-client privilege stay out of any public tool. The risk here is less that the provider trains on your data: it is that you are creating a copy of a sensitive document in a system you do not control and that can be subpoenaed.
Important
Before pasting anything, run three checks: what would happen if the document were published tomorrow, whether your provider handles the information under a business plan or a free one, and whether your company has a written rule on what is not entered. Your team will copy what they see you do.
Frequently asked questions about AI prompts for CEOs
These are the questions that come up most often when a chief executive starts using prompts with ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or Gemini.
What are the best prompts for a chief executive?
The ones that produce disagreement instead of confirmation: the premortem, which treats the decision as failed and asks for the explanation; defending the opposite position before revealing yours; and the assumption map ordered by fragility. Drafting and summarizing prompts also work, but that work pays off more delegated to your executive team than done by you.
How do I stop ChatGPT from always agreeing with me?
Change the order of the conversation. Pose the decision without saying what you prefer, ask first for the argument against it written by someone who truly defends it, and share your position afterward. Add a second request in a new conversation, without the context of the first, and compare the two answers. Where they diverge is the point worth reviewing with a person.
What is the best AI for business: ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini?
It depends on the request. ChatGPT does well in open debate and generating options. Claude holds long documents better, such as contracts, minutes or due diligence reports. Gemini fits if your company works in Google Workspace, and Copilot if it works in Microsoft 365. The practical move is to open the one that matches your source material, not to pick one for everything.
Can I use Claude to review the board pack?
Yes. Claude handles long documents well, so it suits finding inconsistencies between sections, summarizing a due diligence or preparing a director’s uncomfortable questions. Ask it to cite the source section for each point so you can check quickly, and do not paste privileged information.
How are these prompts different from those for an executive or a manager?
Horizon and reversibility. A manager works the week and the team, and their instructions serve planning and follow-up. An executive works the quarter and the area: analyzing their own data, governing projects and reporting. A CEO commits capital and people for years, so what they need from the model is challenge and blind spot detection.
Which 5 ChatGPT prompts for being a better CEO can I use today?
Five that fit in an afternoon: the premortem on the decision on your table, defending the opposite position before the next committee meeting, the assumption map for your annual plan, drafting a new vision to test with your team and the closing criterion for the project you have not closed in months. All five are in the library with the full instruction.
Is it safe to use prompts with my company’s confidential data?
With caveats. A business plan offers contractual guarantees that a free version does not, so start by checking which one you use. Even with those guarantees, a corporate transaction, a disciplinary process and anything under attorney-client privilege stay out. Set a written rule, because the rest of the organization will copy what they see you do.
Your next step with AI prompts for CEOs
None of these techniques decides for you, and that is the point. What they do is reproduce in twenty minutes, and at no political cost, something that is very hard to get inside a company: someone who challenges your plan with arguments before it reaches the board. It also helps you keep perspective when the decision has become personal. The day the model agrees with you on everything, it is the question that failed.
If you want to apply this with method, the practical training in the Online Program in AI and Innovation at Founderz is designed for working professionals with little time. It is fully online, applied to real work and built in collaboration with Microsoft. Founderz is an online business school specialized in applied AI.